Has SNL Been Abducted By Aliens? A Deep Dive Into Its Evolving Humor
There's a peculiar phenomenon that has captivated audiences for decades, a cultural institution that has shaped comedy, launched careers, and occasionally left us scratching our heads in bewilderment. We're talking, of course, about Saturday Night Live (SNL). But lately, one might wonder if the show has been, metaphorically speaking, abducted by aliens. It’s still there, broadcasting live from Studio 8H, but sometimes it feels like it’s operating on a completely different wavelength, its humor beamed in from another dimension.
Let's start with an unpopular opinion, one that many silently harbor but few dare to utter: "I’ve never found The Tonight Show, Letterman, Leno, SNL, etc., funny." This sentiment, while perhaps extreme for some, resonates with a surprising number of viewers who feel that the golden age of late-night and sketch comedy is long past. Sure, "they have had funny moments." Every show, even the most critically panned, can boast a few gems. But on the whole, many would argue that "those shows are and have been way" – way past their prime, way off the mark, or just way too reliant on past glory.
This article isn't just about throwing shade, though. It's an exploration of SNL's complex legacy, its peaks and valleys, and the ongoing debate about what makes something truly funny. We'll delve into its current state, revisit some historical moments, and ponder if the show's unpredictable nature is a feature or a bug.
The Shifting Sands of SNL Humor
Comedy is, by its very nature, subjective. What tickles one person's funny bone might leave another stone-faced. This inherent variability makes judging a show like SNL, which aims to appeal to a broad audience every week, an incredibly challenging task. The show has always been a mirror reflecting contemporary culture, politics, and social anxieties, and as these elements change, so too does the comedic landscape.
For those who grew up with SNL in its perceived heyday, the current iteration can feel alien. The pacing, the character types, the political leanings – all have evolved. While it's true that "they have had funny moments," these moments often feel like isolated islands in a sea of sketches that don't quite land. This leads to the frustrating realization that "on the whole, those shows are and have been way" – way more inconsistent, way less groundbreaking, and perhaps, way too comfortable in their established format.
The constant pressure to deliver fresh, relevant humor in a rapidly changing world is immense. Every week, a new host, new musical guest, and a new set of headlines demand attention. It's a comedic high-wire act performed without a net, and sometimes, the performers simply miss their footing. This isn't a new phenomenon, but perhaps the scrutiny has intensified in the age of instant online critique.
The Modern SNL: Are We Still Laughing?
The sentiment, "If those are two of the funnier skits from recent SNL episodes, I'll pass on the show," is a common refrain among disgruntled viewers. This isn't just about personal taste; it speaks to a perceived decline in overall quality. When the "best of" clips leave you unimpressed, it raises questions about the general standard. It’s easy to be critical, of course. As the saying goes, "Meh, they can't all be winners." And indeed, no show, especially one produced live weekly, can maintain peak comedic genius every single time. There are always going to be duds.
However, the frequency of these "duds" seems to be a growing concern. The show often faces criticism for:
- Overly Political Sketches: While SNL has always engaged with politics, some argue it has become too reliant on political impersonations and less on original sketch concepts.
- Sketch Length: Some sketches feel drawn out, with a single joke stretched thin over several minutes, losing its comedic punch.
- Repetitive Characters: While recurring characters can be beloved, an over-reliance on them can lead to stagnation and predictability.
- Uneven Performances: With a large and constantly rotating cast, some performers shine while others struggle to find their footing.
And to those who complain, there's always the implicit challenge: "Anyway, you post something funny now." It's a valid point. Creating comedy is hard. Creating *consistently good* comedy under immense pressure is even harder. But that doesn't excuse a show from striving for excellence, especially one with the resources and legacy of SNL.
A Trip Down Memory Lane: The 80s and Beyond
While many romanticize SNL's past as a golden age of unadulterated hilarity, it's important to remember that even the most iconic eras had their less-than-stellar moments. The show has been on the air for nearly 50 years, and it's impossible for every single episode to be a masterpiece. For instance, reflecting on some musical performances from the past, one might recall moments where "the music was just as it should be but David Lee Roth..." and then trail off, thinking, "I don't even know what to say." This isn't a knock on the artist, but an acknowledgment that live television, especially with the raw energy of SNL, can produce unexpected results. "Okay, this is proof that there were some not so great moments in the 80's." Indeed, even in its supposed prime, SNL had its share of awkward, confusing, or simply unfunny segments.
These historical footnotes serve as a reminder that SNL's journey has always been a bumpy one. It has survived cast changes, writers' strikes, network interference, and shifting comedic tastes. The show's resilience is, in itself, a testament to its unique place in television history.
When Comedy Meets Controversy: The O.J. Saga
One of the most compelling aspects of SNL's history is its willingness to tackle controversial subjects, often pushing the boundaries of what's considered acceptable on network television. A prime example involves a comedian who "achieved fame on SNL by continually lambasting O.J." during the infamous trial. This particular brand of fearless, no-holds-barred humor resonated with many viewers, establishing the comedian as a cult hero.
However, this fearlessness came at a cost. "That actually got him canned because NBC head Don Olmeyer was a buddy of O.J." This incident highlights the delicate balance SNL has always had to strike between creative freedom and corporate interests. It’s a stark reminder that even a show celebrated for its irreverence operates within the confines of a major network, subject to its whims and relationships. The firing sparked a significant debate about censorship in comedy, the power of network executives, and the public's right to hear uncomfortable truths, even when delivered with a comedic twist.
The Audience's Role and Perception
In the age of social media, the audience's reaction is more visible and vocal than ever before. Before, you might hear anecdotal evidence about how a crowd reacted, but now, every laugh, every groan, every moment of silence is scrutinized online. The phrase "Haven't seen any posts about the crowd, etc." might seem anachronistic in today's environment, where immediate feedback is standard. Yet, it underscores a deeper point: how much does the live audience's energy, or lack thereof, influence our perception of a sketch? Are we watching the show through the lens of a studio audience's genuine reaction, or through the filtered, often curated, lens of online commentary?
The collective consciousness around SNL is constantly being shaped by these interactions. A sketch that bombs live might find new life as a viral clip, or vice versa. The show's "abducted by aliens" quality might just be its inherent unpredictability, amplified by the echo chamber of the internet, where every moment is dissected and debated.
Conclusion
So, has SNL truly been abducted by aliens? Perhaps not literally, but the metaphor serves as a useful lens through which to view its current state. The show continues to be a strange, sometimes brilliant, often baffling entity that beams into our living rooms every Saturday night. It’s a testament to its enduring legacy that despite the "unpopular opinion" that it's not always funny, and the acknowledgement that "they can't all be winners," SNL remains a cultural touchstone.
From its "not so great moments in the 80s" to its controversial decisions like canning a comedian for lambasting O.J., SNL has always been a show of extremes. It has its "funny moments," but on the whole, its consistency can be "way" off. Yet, it persists, evolving, adapting, and occasionally, feeling like it's been beamed in from another dimension. Its unpredictable nature, its willingness to push boundaries (and sometimes pull back), and its reflection of the times continue to make it a unique and often compelling, if sometimes frustrating, viewing experience. The show's journey is a microcosm of comedy itself: subjective, ever-changing, and always open to debate.
Saturday Night Live Returns December 3rd with Keke Palmer & SZA
SNL Cast 2022-2021: The Saturday Night Live Season 47 Cast
Saturday Night Live Season 49: Everything to Know | NBC Insider
